INSCYTE Corporation

2 Berkeley Street, Suite 403,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5A 2W3
Tel: 416-594-9393
Fax: 416-594-2420


2000 CytoBase Report

Cervical Cytology Database Statistics
Volume 4, Number 1, December 31, 2000

Prepared by:

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Inc.

Copyright © 2001 INSCYTE Corporation

All rights reserved.


                                   

Title:

CytoBase Report

Cervical Cytology Database Statistics

January 1st, 2000 through December 31st, 2000

Prepared By:

Natalia Hakh (AIM)

Approved By:

Data Review Committee

Compilation Date:

June 9, 2001

Version Number:

Vol. 4,  No. 1

 Date of Release:

June 15, 2001

This report presents database statistics for the period starting January 1st, 2000 through December 31st, 2000 representing the statistics for 2000.  This report produced by INSCYTE* Corporation contains only a subset of the information that the CytoBase system is capable of providing.

All information in the database is from sources deemed reliable but no warranty or representation is made as to the accuracy thereof, thus reports submitted may be subject to errors and/or omissions beyond the control of INSCYTE Corporation.

The CytoBase Report is copyrighted by INSCYTE Corporation. The copyright holders grant to all parties, without written agreement and without license or royalty fees, limited rights to use, copy, and distribute for any purpose, so long as copyright is acknowledged on all copies and excerpted materials (e.g. CytoBase Report Vol. 4 No. 1 Copyright Ó INSCYTE Corp. - Used by permission)

Copyright © 2001 INSCYTE Corporation

Information Systems for Cytology Etc.


Table of Contents

2000  CytoBase Report Highlights. 1

Editorial Commentary. 2

What is CytoBase?. 4

Legend for Diagnostic Classes. 4

CytoBase Technical Summary (as of May 3rd, 2001) 5

Submitting Laboratories. 6

Women Based Statistics. 7

Distribution of the Most Severe Diagnosis for Women by Age and Class. 7

Distribution of Women with Diagnosis of ASCUS or AGUS by Age. 8

Distribution of Women with Diagnosis of Low Grade or High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial 

Lesions by Age. 9

Distribution of Women with Cytological Diagnosis of Carcinoma by Age and Cell Type. 10

Distribution of Women by Age as a Percentage of the Female Population of Ontario. 11

Report Based Statistics. 12

Distribution of Reports by Age and Diagnostic Class. 12

Specimen Adequacy Statistics. 13

Reason for Specimen Limitations. 14

Reason for Specimen Inadequacy. 15

Cumulative Database - Distribution by Age and Diagnostic Class. 16


2000  CytoBase Report Highlights

 

What is CytoBase?

CytoBase is a patient-centered computerized medical record of Cytology reports with on-line submission and query capabilities. The system was designed, developed and made operational by Artificial Intelligence In Medicine Inc. (AIM), a Toronto based software engineering firm under contract to INSCYTE Corporation, a not for profit organization formed by six private medical laboratories1 and subsequently Cancer Care Ontario. The system started operations on June 1, 1996.

Participating laboratories automatically download all cervical cytology results and related patient data to the central database on a daily basis.  The system software automatically registers new patients and links reports to patient records.  Cytotechnologists and pathologists reading smears at the participating laboratories have on-line access to this database to improve diagnostic accuracy, and ensure that pre-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions are not overlooked.

Legend for Diagnostic Classes

All cervical/vaginal cytologic specimen diagnoses are based on The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical/Vaginal Cytologic Diagnoses (The Bethesda System), which are categorized as follows:

1. WNL: Within Normal Limits
2. BCC: Benign Cellular Changes
3. ASCUS: Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance
4. AGUS: Atypical Glandular Cells of Undetermined Significance
5. LSIL: Low Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions
6. HSIL: High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (including carcinoma in situ)
7. Ca: Carcinoma
8. Oth.Mal.: Other Malignancies (including sarcoma)
9. Oth.Ab.: Other abnormal cells seen (not otherwise classified)

 

In the diagnostic statistics presented herein, where a report includes findings falling into more than one classification, only the most severe class is included in the count.  In the event that a report includes “other abnormal cells”  (item 9) in combination with one or more of items 2 through 8, only the most severe of classes 2 through 8 is counted.

Each CytoBase report also contains the following information (to the extent that it has been provided by the source):

a) Detailed description of specimen adequacy or limitations thereof
b) Diagnostic classification according to the CytoBase Abstract Coding Syntax based on the Bethesda System (Please refer to the INSCYTE Website www.inscyte.org)
c) Identification of specimen collection method
d) Identification of slide preparation (e.g. traditional or monolayer)
e) Identification of analysis method (e.g. microscopic, automated, computer assisted)
f) Pathologist’s recommendations (e.g. repeat smear in # months, colposcopy, biopsy, curettage, etc.)
g)  Pathologist’s comments

1 Med-Chem Laboratories Ltd.
The Dynacare Health Group Inc.
Excel Bestview Medical Laboratories Ltd.
Flemingdon Medical Laboratories Ltd.
Gamma North Peel Laboratories Ltd.
MDS Health Group Inc.

 

CytoBase Technical Summary (as of May 3rd, 2001)

Performance:

Min. Report Transmission Speed: 229 reports per minute at 44,000 BPS (average)
Auto-Registration Rate: 50 patients reports per minute (average)
Rejection Rate: 0.6% average (primarily due to missing information or format errors)
Registered Reports:  5,195,522
Registered Patient ID’s: 2,798,741
System Capacity: 10 million reports on current storage devices
5 million women on current storage devices

 

Hardware & Software:

Production Server  
CPU: Compaq Alpha Server ES40 AXP 64-bit RISC @ 233 MHz
Memory: 512 Mbytes RAM
Operating System: Compaq TRU-64  UNIX (copyright © Compaq)
Database System: Oracle 8i - v8.1.6 RDBMS (copyright © Oracle Corporation)
Application Software:  ISIS-CSP (copyright © AIM Inc.)
ISIS-CEI  (copyright © AIM Inc.)
ISIS-CY_CDR  (copyright © AIM Inc.)
TransMed EDI (copyright © AIM Inc.)
Disk Capacity: 48 Gigabytes
Network Protocol: TCP/IP
Messaging Protocol: HL7 Version 2.3
Fault Tolerance:  RAID Level 1 & 5 Hot Swap, UPS, auto-shutdown and auto-backup, advanced replication
Security: PKI based private key, public key, and session key
   
Mirror Server  
CPU: Digital Equipment Alpha AXP 64-bit RISC @ 233 MHz
Memory: 256 Mbytes RAM
Operating System: Compaq TRU-64  UNIX (copyright © Compaq)
Database System:  Oracle 8i - v8.1.6 RDBMS (copyright © Oracle Corporation)
Application Software: ISIS-CSP (copyright © AIM Inc.)
ISIS-CEI  (copyright © AIM Inc.)
ISIS-CY_CDR  (copyright © AIM Inc.)
TransMed EDI (copyright © AIM Inc.)
Disk Capacity: 28 Gigabytes
Network Protocol:  TCP/IP
Messaging Protocol: HL7 Version 2.3
Fault Tolerance:   RAID Level 1 & 5 Hot Swap, UPS, auto-shutdown and auto-backup, advanced replication
Security: PKI based private key, public key, and session key

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Submitting Laboratories

Participating Laboratories

Date of First Transmission to CytoBase

Specimen Date of Reports From

*

Gamma North Peel Laboratories Ltd.

Jun. 9, 1996

Jun. 1, 1993

*

Flemingdon Medical Laboratories Ltd.

Jun. 11, 1996

Apr. 15, 1996

 

MDS Laboratories

Oct 10th, 1996

Oct 2, 1996

 

Gamma-Dynacare Medical Laboratories Airport Division

Nov. 22, 1996

Nov. 14, 1996

*

Excel Bestview Medical Laboratories Ltd.

Mar. 17, 1997

May 5, 1992

 

Gamma-Dynacare Medical Laboratories  Ottawa Division

Jul. 15, 1998

Jan. 19, 1998

 

Gamma-Dynacare Medical Laboratories  Windsor Division

Aug. 17, 1999

May 12, 1999

 

Canadian Medical Laboratories

Dec. 22, 1999

May 11, 1999

 

Medical Laboratories of Windsor

Oct. 19, 2000

Feb. 5, 1999

*  Laboratories now merged with others.


Women Based Statistics

The following tables and figures categorize women by the most severe diagnosis for the period of time specified (January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000) and the woman’s age.  The age is calculated based on the  woman’s date of birth at the time the specimen was taken with the most severe diagnosis.

Distribution of the Most Severe Diagnosis for Women by Age and Class

January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000

 

  1. The “other malignancies” category includes unclassified malignancies (11), favour adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma (3) and poorly differentiated carcinoma (1)
  2. The “other abnormal” category includes findings and/or suspicion of abnormalities that were not formally classified.
  3. The total number of women in the above table is less than the number of women registered (1,405,756) because the age of the woman (1,204), or the diagnostic class according to the Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical/Vaginal Cytologic Diagnoses cannot be determined (29,092) from submitted information.

In the diagnostic statistics presented herein, where a women has two or more reports, only the most severe class is included in the count.


Women Based Statistics

Distribution of Women with Diagnosis of ASCUS or AGUS by Age

Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance account for 2.44% (33,593) of reported findings.

Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance account for 0.42% (5,773) of reported findings.


Women Based Statistics

Distribution of Women with Diagnosis of Low Grade or High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions by Age

Low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions account for 1.11% (15,244) of reported findings.

High grade squamous intraepithelial lesions account for 0.36% (4,937) of reported findings.


Women Based Statistics

Distribution of Women with Cytological Diagnosis of Carcinoma by Age and Cell Type

Carcinomas account for 0.01% (172) of reported findings.

A cytological diagnosis was made of

 

 Women Based Statistics

Distribution of Women by Age as a Percentage of the Female Population of Ontario

1 Taken from Total by Age Group of the Distribution of the Most Severe Diagnosis for Women by Age and Class (page 11)

2 Demography Division, Statistics Canada: preliminary post-census estimates for 2000 Ontario population.


Report Based Statistics

The following table lists reported findings categorized by diagnostic class (most severe finding on the report) and the woman’s age.  The age is calculated based on the  woman’s date of birth at the time the specimen was taken with the most severe diagnosis.

Distribution of Reports by Age and Diagnostic Class

Specimens Received  from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000

1    The “other abnormal” category includes findings and/or suspicion of abnormalities that were not formally classified.

2    The total number of reports in the above table is less than the number of reports received (1,438,948) because the age of the woman (1,243), or the diagnostic class according to The Bethesda System cannot be determined (22,626) from submitted information. Unsatisfactory reports, which included a diagnosis, are used in the above table and are allocated to in the appropriate age and diagnostic category.


Report Based Statistics

Specimen Adequacy Statistics

   

   

Of the total number of reports (1,438,948) in the interval examined, there were 76.43% reports (1,099,806) with no limitations. These included 6,293 (0.57%) reports in which clinical information was missing.  Of the remaining reports, 22.94% (330,030) were limited in some way and 9,112  (0.63%) were deemed unsatisfactory for cytological evaluation.


Report Based Statistics

Reason for Specimen Limitations

 

               

*This total includes 6,293 reports with missing clinical information.


Report Based Statistics

Reason for Specimen Inadequacy

*Includes unsatisfactory specimens with a diagnosis


Report Based Statistics

Cumulative Database - Distribution by Age and Diagnostic Class

Reports Received from June 1,1996 to December 31, 2000 as of May 3, 2001

                                                                                                                        

1  The “other abnormal” category includes findings and/or suspicion of abnormalities that were not formally classified.

2  The total number of reports in the above table is less than the number of reports received because the age of the woman, or the diagnostic class according to The Bethesda System cannot be determined from submitted information.  In addition, reports were classified as unsatisfactory and are not included.  If a report is classified as unsatisfactory but a diagnosis is included, the specimen adequacy is disregarded and the diagnosis is used in the above table in the appropriate age and diagnostic category.

A comparison of Cumulative Data from previous CytoBase reports may show changes in classification due to reports that were subsequently amended.